177

Christ’s Commission and Obama’s Mandate: A Teachable Moment

The big news in American Catholic circles is the Obama administration’s “contraceptive mandate.” This latest unethical intrusion of big governmnet stipulates that employers, including religious institutions, provide their employees with insurance coverage for contraceptives, sterilizations, and specific abortifacients such as Ella and Plan B.

Catholic Action League Executive Director C. J. Doyle summarized the situation: “If this unprecedented aggression against the religious freedom rights of Catholics is allowed to stand, then virtually all Catholic institutions — colleges, universities, secondary schools, hospitals, charities, service providers, fraternal orders, and advocacy organizations — will be forced to pay for procedures, devices, and chemicals abhorrent to the consciences of Catholics.”

by Brother André Marie February 4th, 2012

College President’s Letter to NH Legislators on HHS Mandate


Brian Kelly

The following is an open letter that Dr. William Fahey sent to New Hampshire’s senators and Congressman Guinta voicing his outrage over President Obama and the HHS  mandate requiring submission of all employers to provide contraceptives, sterilizations, and abortions under so-called health insurance for employees.


Restore Communion On The Tongue Only


Brother André Marie

Two priests, Fr. Andrew Wise and Fr. John Speekman, have started a petition effort on their blog called “Restore Communion On The Tongue Only.” They, and the 2484 (so far) signatories to their petition, are asking the Pope to restore the ancient and traditional Roman practice of reception of Holy Communion that was obligatory until Pope Paul VI approved the 1969 Vatican Instruction, Memoriale Domini.


Color Flyer of Chapel Project


View the new color PDF flyer on our IHM Chapel building project.

chapel_color_pdf.jpg


Brother André Marie to Speak in Louisiana


The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary

On Wednesday, February 8, 2012, Brother André Marie will be speaking at Sacred Heart of Jesus Church in Lacombe, Louisiana. The title of his talk is “Penance and the Conversion of America.” It will begin at 6:30 PM.

The talk is sponsored by the Mysterium Fidei Latin …


Mystic Monk Coffee



Obama Says Social Policies Motivated by Bible and Teaching of Jesus


Brian Kelly

When most of our foreign aid goes to the militarization of bogus allies and population reduction of African nations through so-called health care, one is again stunned to hear the president ignore these facts and pretend that the purpose of foreign aid is to help feed the poor and the refugees and provide medicines for the sick.


Temporary Fruits of Ecumenical Reflection


Brother André Marie

From the Holy Father’s Address to the Participants of the Plenary Session of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith:
Also the study documents produced by the various ecumenical dialogues have great relevance. Such texts cannot be ignored, because they are an important, though temporary, fruit of the common reflection matured throughout the years. Nevertheless, they are to be recognized


Obama and Administration Wage War Against Pro-Lifers Freedom of Conscience


Brian Kelly

By imperial edict, and as a dark insult to pro-lifers who were preparing their annual march to the Capitol to protest Roe v Wade and the ensuing murders of the pre-born, President Obama and self-deluded “Catholic” Kathleen Sabelius of the Department of Health and Human Services  have given new meaning to the word dictatorial. Genuinely Catholic and pro-life employers have been issued an ultimatum. They have one year to decide if they will serve God or the leviathan state. What boldness! What injustice!


Is There Fight Left in Hungary?


The Philosopher

We hope so. Daniel McAdams exposes the reheated communist apparatchiks and their fellow revolutionary travelers who run the European Union, and who are trying to bring the nation of Saint Stephen to its knees. Now the Hungarians are taking to the streets to insist that their government not be cowed by the threats of a despotic EU leadership.
Are the Hungarians at it again? Fifty-six years ago Hungarians landed what was ultimately the fatal blow to Soviet domination of Eastern Europe.


Multiracial Protest against SPLC ‘Bigots’


The Philosopher

Said one black pastor to homosexual activists: “how dare you compare your wicked, deviant, immoral, self-destructive, anti-human sexual behavior to our beautiful skin color.” What merited such a lambasting? The SPLC’s smearing pro-family organizations as “hate groups” for opposing the homosexual agenda.

Wouldn’t it be good to hear Catholic priests speaking with such conviction?


Resources
Affiliated Sites

News

Jewish Author Says the Dogma is the Root Cause of Antisemism!

Email This Post Print Subscribe
by   May 16th, 2005
Catholicism.org

It is openly declared:  The Dogma Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus is root cause of Christian antisemitism and as such, must be explicitly renounced.

goldhagen.jpg

Daniel Jonah Goldhagen

Jewish author Daniel Goldhagen’s recent book A Moral Reckoning: The Role of the Catholic Church in the Holocaust and Its Unfulfilled Duty of Repair contains what may be considered the ultimate aim of all the Holocaust propaganda which came before.  The accusation that the Church’s most fundamental doctrine is the reason why there is Christian antisemitism, and because of this, the dogma Extra Eccesiam Nulla Salus must be officially renounced by the Church.

Root cause of antisemitism?

Goldhagen, in his chapter “Repairing the Harm”, writes:

Take, for example, the Catholic Church’s denial that Jews can be saved without embracing Jesus.  This critical view encompasses and fuels many of the Church’s deprecating views of Jews and of Judaism as inferior, false, and wayward.  Some have argued that it is a root cause, if not the root cause, of Christian antisemitism.  A prominent Christian participant in Christian-Jewish dialogue, Helen Fry, who has edited a wide-ranging and searching volume with many of the dialogue’s most important contributions from Catholics, Protestants, and Jews, reflects on the unfinished tasks ahead in the volume’s concluding essay, “Challenges for the Future.”  She observes that “until the churches make theological space for Judaism by accepting it as a legitimate path of salvation, then much anti-Judaism will remain.  As long as Judaism is not granted a salvific status in its own right, Christians will continue to see it as an inferior and inadequate faith.  This soteriological reappraisal is, I suggest, vital for future relations between Jews and Christians.”

Although some progressive Catholics assert that the Jews can find salvation through Judaism, and although Church representatives occasionally drop hints that this is possible, the Christian Bible is unambiguous in stating that “there is no salvation through anyone else [but Jesus], nor is there any other name under heaven given to the human race by which we are to be saved.” The Church’s official doctrine, faithful to Christian Scriptures and now in existence for almost two millennia, is unbending and unequivocal: Jews cannot attain salvation through Judaism.  It declares “Outside the Church there is no salvation.”

…So the Church declares, “Baptism is necessary for salvation for those to whom the Gospel has been proclaimed and who have had the possibility of asking for this sacrament.”  How would this not pertain to Jews?  The Church’s doctrinal account of who will descend into the “eternity” of hell “where they suffer the punishments of …’eternal fire,’ announces that hell, or as Jesus calls it, ‘Gehenna,’ is reserved for those who to the end of their lives refuse to believe and be converted ” (author’s emphasis) — as Jews do today and as they did during the time of Jesus and when the Gospels were written and for whom the Gospel authors seemed to have specifically inserted such damning statements.

John Paul II and other Vatican leaders are aware that some progressive Catholics are adopting pluralist positions on salvation, and that there is grumbling within the Church among those who would loosen Catholicism’s claimed stranglehold on salvation even ever so slightly.  In an explicit and pointed rebuke to them and their religious “relativistic mentality” — including to those in the Christian-Jewish dialogue who are particularly concerned with countermanding Catholicism’s supersessionist teachings about Jews, with Catholicism’s antisemitic tradition, and with its explicit denial that Judaism is a path to salvation — the Pontifical Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, led by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, defiantly ushered in the new millennium by reaffirming in Dominus Iesus of 2000, a document which John Paul II “with sure knowledge and by his apostolic authority, ratified and confirmed” that it is “contrary to the faith to consider the Church as one way of salvation alongside those constituted by the other religions.” Why?  Because “the prayers and the rituals of the other religions” are lacking in “a divine origin or an ex opere operato salvific efficacy.”  So that there can be no misunderstanding, Dominus Iesus declared that “those solutions that propose a salvific action of God beyond the unique mediation of Christ would be contrary to Christian and Catholic faith.”

And how is the Church to fix this state of affairs?  Renounce Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus !

Goldhagen continues:

Until the Catholic Church inscribes in its official doctrine reformed statements of the sort that I have just discussed, and until the Church announces them loudly, emphatically, and repeatedly, so that there is no doubt and no possibility of misunderstanding about them, we should not mistake the theological reflections of some Catholics or hints by the Church, no matter how encouraging they may sound, as anything but what they are:  laudable personal reflections and intimations.  Given the damage that the Church’s antisemitic, anti-Jewish, anti-Judaic — call them what you will — doctrinal and theological positions have caused is it really too much to expect the Catholic Church to announce their nullification and replacement of such still existing injurious and demeaning doctrine and theology as unambiguously and forcefully as it possibly can?

Summarizing then what Danial Jonah Goldhagen writes in his most recent book: the Catholic Church’s most foundational dogma Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus lies at the very heart of antisemitism as practiced by Christians.  While he praises those Liberal Catholics and Modernists for their attempts at being pluralistic about salvation, he sees that the Church has always and to this day continues to officially teach that there is no possibility of salvation outside her pale.  (As an aside, he certainly knows Catholic teaching on this subject!)

As the antisemitic attitude of Christians comes from this dogma then, it is necessary to renounce “loudly, emphatically, and repeatedly” the dogma No Salvation Outside the Church!  It would seem that he wants the Pope himself to issue an anti-dogma directly contradicting the Church’s foundational teaching.

And we know that this could not happen as per the design of the Jews or any other force in the world.  It may be that the Pope is forced to speak on this issue, and it may be that the Jews force him to speak.  It may be then and only then that the Pope will take on the responsibility asked of him by the Mother of God at Fatima — to reaffirm the Dogma of the Faith.  Let us pray that the Pope does in fact speak authoritatively, so that the blindness of the Jews may be lifted, that they may acknowledge the light of God’s truth, and be rescued from their darkness.

FacebookNewsVineTwitterLinkedInDeliciousShare

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Email This Post Print Subscribe
http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/dzone_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/stumbleupon_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/blinklist_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/blogmarks_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/furl_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/newsvine_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/technorati_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/magnolia_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/myspace_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/yahoobuzz_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_48.png
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
  • http://www.whippleshire.com/nsblog LJ

    I don’t expect Benedict XVI to suddenly repudiate EENS so Mr. Goldhagen’s appeal is simply rhetorical, and I think he knows it.
    But Mr. Goldhagen’s premise is in error. Holding to EENS does not translate to anti-semitism. By anti-semitism we are speaking of race, not religion.

    That is the confusion is it not? It is what some Catholics can fall into if they are not vigilant. To deny a religion is salvific is not the same as hating a race of people. Unfortunately, Judaism and Jewish heritage are tied together and have been since the tribe of Judah, and thus; 1. anyone denying the one is automatically assumed to hate the other;
    2. on the other side it is easy to ascribe to a race the errors or even the condemnations of a religion.

    What’s worse, the evil machinations of a man or some men, whose actions, practices and/or influence may be directed against the Catholic Church and because their race is Jewish it will be assumed that they are part of a religious conspiracy when more often than not in these times they are just as atheist and secular humanist as any other anti-Catholic. It doesn’t condone what they do, but it certainly is not “Jewish” in any religious sort of way and to describe it as a “Jewish” issue in any other sense is to fall into actual anti-semitism or racism.

    Where legitimate discussion of religious differences end between Jews and Catholics is often where race begins. Certainly it is a fine line and takes discernment and there is ample religious disagreement. Nor should we be intimidated into modifying or muting the message of Jesus Christ. If we didn’t believe it to be true we wouldn’t follow it and we cannot compromise the truth.

    Knowing how few Jews actually believe and practice their faith or even give lip-service to it causes me to cringe at the rhetorical paranoia of some who see a Jewish conspiracy behind every evil idea that comes down the pike or behind every weakening of faith and morals among Catholics. We can be faithless enough on our own without blaming anyone else. In either case the answer is the same. A return to orthodox faith in our own house.