177

Christ’s Commission and Obama’s Mandate: A Teachable Moment

The big news in American Catholic circles is the Obama administration’s “contraceptive mandate.” This latest unethical intrusion of big governmnet stipulates that employers, including religious institutions, provide their employees with insurance coverage for contraceptives, sterilizations, and specific abortifacients such as Ella and Plan B.

Catholic Action League Executive Director C. J. Doyle summarized the situation: “If this unprecedented aggression against the religious freedom rights of Catholics is allowed to stand, then virtually all Catholic institutions — colleges, universities, secondary schools, hospitals, charities, service providers, fraternal orders, and advocacy organizations — will be forced to pay for procedures, devices, and chemicals abhorrent to the consciences of Catholics.”

by Brother André Marie February 4th, 2012

College President’s Letter to NH Legislators on HHS Mandate


Brian Kelly

The following is an open letter that Dr. William Fahey sent to New Hampshire’s senators and Congressman Guinta voicing his outrage over President Obama and the HHS  mandate requiring submission of all employers to provide contraceptives, sterilizations, and abortions under so-called health insurance for employees.


Restore Communion On The Tongue Only


Brother André Marie

Two priests, Fr. Andrew Wise and Fr. John Speekman, have started a petition effort on their blog called “Restore Communion On The Tongue Only.” They, and the 2484 (so far) signatories to their petition, are asking the Pope to restore the ancient and traditional Roman practice of reception of Holy Communion that was obligatory until Pope Paul VI approved the 1969 Vatican Instruction, Memoriale Domini.


Color Flyer of Chapel Project


View the new color PDF flyer on our IHM Chapel building project.

chapel_color_pdf.jpg


Brother André Marie to Speak in Louisiana


The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary

On Wednesday, February 8, 2012, Brother André Marie will be speaking at Sacred Heart of Jesus Church in Lacombe, Louisiana. The title of his talk is “Penance and the Conversion of America.” It will begin at 6:30 PM.

The talk is sponsored by the Mysterium Fidei Latin …


Mystic Monk Coffee



Obama Says Social Policies Motivated by Bible and Teaching of Jesus


Brian Kelly

When most of our foreign aid goes to the militarization of bogus allies and population reduction of African nations through so-called health care, one is again stunned to hear the president ignore these facts and pretend that the purpose of foreign aid is to help feed the poor and the refugees and provide medicines for the sick.


Temporary Fruits of Ecumenical Reflection


Brother André Marie

From the Holy Father’s Address to the Participants of the Plenary Session of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith:
Also the study documents produced by the various ecumenical dialogues have great relevance. Such texts cannot be ignored, because they are an important, though temporary, fruit of the common reflection matured throughout the years. Nevertheless, they are to be recognized


Obama and Administration Wage War Against Pro-Lifers Freedom of Conscience


Brian Kelly

By imperial edict, and as a dark insult to pro-lifers who were preparing their annual march to the Capitol to protest Roe v Wade and the ensuing murders of the pre-born, President Obama and self-deluded “Catholic” Kathleen Sabelius of the Department of Health and Human Services  have given new meaning to the word dictatorial. Genuinely Catholic and pro-life employers have been issued an ultimatum. They have one year to decide if they will serve God or the leviathan state. What boldness! What injustice!


Is There Fight Left in Hungary?


The Philosopher

We hope so. Daniel McAdams exposes the reheated communist apparatchiks and their fellow revolutionary travelers who run the European Union, and who are trying to bring the nation of Saint Stephen to its knees. Now the Hungarians are taking to the streets to insist that their government not be cowed by the threats of a despotic EU leadership.
Are the Hungarians at it again? Fifty-six years ago Hungarians landed what was ultimately the fatal blow to Soviet domination of Eastern Europe.


Multiracial Protest against SPLC ‘Bigots’


The Philosopher

Said one black pastor to homosexual activists: “how dare you compare your wicked, deviant, immoral, self-destructive, anti-human sexual behavior to our beautiful skin color.” What merited such a lambasting? The SPLC’s smearing pro-family organizations as “hate groups” for opposing the homosexual agenda.

Wouldn’t it be good to hear Catholic priests speaking with such conviction?


Resources
Affiliated Sites

News

Brother André Marie

New Comments Policy

Email This Post Print Subscribe
by   July 22nd, 2009
Catholicism.org

When we began the new Catholicism.org on the WordPress platform, the default settings for comments was as follows: as soon as someone had one comment approved, he was “in the club,” so to speak. All of his subsequent comments were automatically posted without moderation. Because of this, some problematic comments made their way onto the site without our scrutiny, and had to be pulled down. I have recently changed the comments settings to force every comment to await moderation. This means each one will have to be approved before it appears on the site.

I like to think that I am liberal (as in “generous”) in allowing postings that disagree with article contents. However, we have to draw lines in the sand. Therefore, rules are in order:

1. We do not allow negative criticism of the Supreme Pontiff or the bishops in communion with him. If you are tempted to blast a spiritual father, for whatever reason, say a prayer for him instead. If you can’t do that, go to confession.

2. It is reasonable to critique the beliefs of non-Catholics. While doing so, we must recall the following words of Saint Paul: “Doing the truth in charity” (Eph. 4:15). Any acrid or nasty comments directed to any group of people will not be allowed. Remember, we want non-Catholics to convert to the true Faith. Bashing them doesn’t help.

3. Personal attacks against authors will not be posted. Neither will personal attacks against the founders of the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

4. Blasphemy, foul language, bathroom talk, and links to immoral web sites will not be allowed.

FacebookNewsVineTwitterLinkedInDeliciousShare
Email This Post Print Subscribe
http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/dzone_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/stumbleupon_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/blinklist_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/blogmarks_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/furl_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/newsvine_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/technorati_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/magnolia_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/myspace_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/yahoobuzz_48.png http://catholicism.org/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_48.png
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
  • http://None Ray Sifdol

    Well Bro. Andre Marie:

    With your new policy I’m sure my comments will no longer be posted, no matter what they are. In fact, I’m sure that my comments are probably what prompted your new policy. Interestingly enough, many of my comments were not in the “naughty” category, and yet no response to them was ever made.

    In any event, your website is no different than any other religious website. You simply can’t deal with any criticism of the Roman Catholic Church in general, or your brand of it in particular. The more educated and literate the comments are the less you like it. In any event, your new rules have only proved what I thought in the first place. Anyone who writes a comment must agree with you. Instead of directly telling individuals you like or don’t like what they have said you come up with the new rules. This is what I expected from religious autocrats. You have proved my point.

    I’m sure that in the future I will see nothing but adoring comments telling you how great your website etc. is. I think what really set you off were my comments on Joseph and Mary. Instead of reasoning it out, all you really did was throw doctrine at me. I’m sure you won’t miss me. However, I do want to thank you for proving my point that religion really is a racket. Actually, “racket” applies more to Protestant outfits. The RC Church is more like the Mafia.

  • Brother André Marie

    Dear Mr. Sifdol,

    Had you motivated this new policy, and had I a wish to block your comments from the site wholesale, I would have simply marked your address as that of a spammer. Your comments would automatically go in the trash. That’s not what I did. In fact, I’ve only removed a couple of your comments, like the recent one with a crass scatological reference to Saint Simon Stylites.

    I’m not interested in merely “adoring” comments. In fact, as you may notice later today, your rather un-adoring comments have motivated me to write a new article. Think of it as a tribute to civil religious “dialogue.”

    I think our new policy is reasonable. And I’m no autocrat. If you call me that again, I’ll block your address from the site. :-)

  • http://None Ray Sifdol

    Fair enough. I am looking forward to reading your new article. I WILL REFRAIN FROM REFERRING TO YOU WITH THE WORD THAT STARTS WITH AN “A” I’m with you completely on Rule #4, but don’t completely agree with the others. However, I will abide by them.

    With that said, Rules #1 and #3 are understandable in the light of the fact that you are, after all, a Roman Catholic organization. I will really have to watch myself carefully on Rule #2. There are all too many groups out there that really are “rackets” of the worst type, and in my opinion they deserve to be bashed. But, I will try to control myself. I do apologize for my comment on RC and Mafia. That comment on my part really was not nice.

    In any event, thanks for responding and being up front. I will moderate my own comments in the future. I think I know where you stand now. However, I really do think that some of the comments that are posted tend to be on the “adoring” side. They tend to be sincere, and are “sweet” and all that but just don’t say very much. In other words they do little to stimulate the intellect.

    Finally, I look forward to a much improved relationship with your website in the future. Thanks again for being up front.

  • http://None Raymond L. Sifdol

    I read your new article. Thanks for being charitable with me. I work under the handicaps of: 1)Being a Freemason, although I have been inactive for many years. 2)Having attended Mormon Primary for many years as a child, and 3)Having a graduate degree in European History. I’ll explain the details later. Thanks again.

  • Philangelus

    Dear Br. Andre,

    Perhaps you can turn comments off on certain or many articles so that you do not have to spend a lot of time going over each and every comment. Other blogs have this policy and have closed comments on many of their threads. Of course, I do not know how many comments you get and if it is a manageable amount, but that is just my two cents. You may also save yourself from having to read some probably obscene and disgusting language which the Internet certainly is full of and you will have time for writing some more of your educational material.

  • http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/ Brother André Marie

    Thanks, Philangelus. That’s a great idea.

  • http://sewinginthepines.angelfire.com Julie Larsen

    Hi, Br. Andre,
    I love your rules and hope for peaceful dialogs with others on here.
    Julie

  • http://None Raymond L. Sifdol

    Dear Brother Andre Marie:

    I don’t know how many comments you get either. Reading the many articles you and others write, I don’t see many comments at all. The ones I do see, usually praise the article. Most of the articles are excellent, so I don’t understand the few comments I see which are so lackluster. The articles are intellectually stimulating although they are one-sided pro-Catholic as can be expected.

    With the exception of the “New Comments Policy” Rule #4 (with which I totally agree) there is very little if any room for any criticism of the Roman Catholic Church by non-Catholics. If Protestants cannot criticize the Pope (without insulting him) what is left?

    Have you ever considered starting a discussion forum where non-Catholics, non-believers, and those of other religions can debate with you and others, and actually receive answers to their comments? Of course there would be rules but they would have to be revised. Please think about this.

    Thanks and have a good day.

  • http://None Raymond L. Sifdol

    Let me add just one more thing and then I will “rest my case.” Instead of being overly sensitive to the comments of non-Catholics and others, an open forum (with rules) might help greatly to show others that you are not a hate group.

    Don’t forget that you are still on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s hate group list along with Neo-Nazis and Aryan Supremacy groups. That is the real insult, and not some Protestant saying something to the effect that they don’t believe the Pope is always right etc. etc. Or my saying that I think some saint is nutty.

    Otherwise, you will continue to be presented to the public as “Radical” Traditional Catholics, and allow yourselves to be fitted into the category with some semi-literate, animalistic (evolution might be true,) dimwits with tatoos, in and out of prison, who don’t even know the name of the current Pope. Of course I am “bashing” those people. Do they deserve to be presented as misguided people who are really sweet underneath all those tatoos and bulging muscles? Maybe you can’t “bash” them but I can.

    On that somewhat unhappy note, reconsider what I have said. Again, you are still on the SPLC list, and I really believe that a forum with non-Catholics, non-believers and others would be beneficial for your cause.

    Thanks for your consideration, and again, I rest my case. Thanks.

  • http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/ Brother André Marie

    Mr. Sifdol,

    To be transparent with you, I’m less concerned about the comments of non-Catholics than about the comments of Catholics. I don’t expect you to profess every point of the Catholic Faith and show the kind of respect demanded of Catholics to the Church’s leadership. If you express your views in a respectful way, and avoid insulting Our Lady and the saints, there will probably be no problem.

  • http://None Raymond L. Sifdol

    Thanks for taking the time to answer. I get the message which is, if I understand it correctly, that you prefer comments by Catholics. That’s understandable. I believe we started out “talking” to each other around April 2009. It has certainly not been dull. I take my leave, and wish you good luck.

  • http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/ Brother André Marie

    Mr. Sifdol,

    You’re welcome. No, you didn’t get the right message. I think it great that non-Catholics post on our web site. It gives us opportunities to explain our faith to you.

  • http://None Raymond L. Sifdol

    Dear Brother Andre Marie:

    Thanks. Sounds like an offer I should not refuse, which means I’ll have to keep posting on your web site. I can assure you that in the future I will play by the rules.

    With that said, I have a question. I know that Father Francis Talbot (a Jesuit) wrote the definitive biographies on the 17th Century Jesuit Martyrs, Jesuit Fathers Isaac Jogues and Jean Brebeuf. I believe both of these priests are now Saints, along with six others. Quite frankly, if anyone deserves to be a saint these two and the others certainly do. In fact, I have not met any Protestants who don’t admire the Jesuits in the movie “The Mission.” Of course that was in Paraguay in the 18th Century. Most Protestants don’t know much about the Jesuits in French Canada in the 17th Century. There is a novel and a movie about that called “Black Robe” but I don’t think it depicts the lone Jesuit in that film in a very good light.

    I guess my point here is that Catholic missionaries were already at work in the New World before the Pilgrim’s landed at Plymouth Rock. By comparison, the Calvinists (in my opinion) failed to missionize the Indians, and in fact sowed discord among them, and prepared the way for future enmity between Native Americans and later pioneers. In fact, my understanding is that the only person the tribes of the U.S. trusted in the 19th Century was another Jesuit priest by the name of Fr. Pierre de Smet.

    With that long winded comment, can you tell me where I can get a copy of Fr. Talbot’s biography on Saint Jean Brebeuf? I believe it is titled “Saint Among the Hurons.” I know that his biography on Saint Isaac Jogues (“Saint Among Savages”) is available through Ignatius Books, but I still want to read both books.

    Thanks for your help, and thanks again for your patience.

    Sincerely,Cordially, and Respectfully

    Ray Sifdol

  • http://brotherandre.stblogs.com/ Brother André Marie

    Dear Mr. Sifdol,

    Those volumes are personal favorites of mine. Father Talbot was an editor at America magazine the same time our founder, Father Feeney, was. They were friends. I don’t know of anybody now publishing Saint Among the Hurons, but I would imagine you can get it used on Amazon.com or someplace like that.

    If you can’t find it, let me know. I can lend you ours by USPS mail (as long as you promise to send it back!).

  • http://None Raymond L. Sifdol

    Thanks for your generosity on the loan offer. Also thanks for your prompt reply, because I know you are busy. I really appreciate it. I don’t know why I did not think of this before, but I’m going to try the inter-library loan system before I bother you anymore. But just in case, I’m glad you have it, and you can be sure that if I borrowed it from you I would return it.

    Thanks again.

    Sincerely, Ray Sifdol

  • Erin Baker

    I believe that this policy is quite fair.