The British Invasion

The Spanish and French strove to make America Catholic, with varying degrees of success. Sometimes the enemies of the Faith — both fleshly and ghostly — won out; at other times, the missionaries scored victories, as with Saint Augustine, Florida, and Santa Fe, New Mexico. All things considered, America was moving in a Catholic direction. But then something disastrous happened, reversing many of the gains made by our Hispano- and Franco-American Catholic forebears. It was one of the tragic turns of history.

The English got here.

England was once called “Mary’s Dowry.” She owed her evangelization to a holy monastic troop led by Saint Augustine of Canterbury, himself sent by Saint Gregory the Great. Her evangelization was, in fact, a specifically Roman, papal project, and in her first fervor she gave us piles of saints. In the high Middle Ages, she provided Christendom with more piles of saints, along with great Catholic Universities (e.g., Oxford, Cambridge), a wonderful literature (e.g., The Canterbury Tales), and a rich culture big and broad and beautiful enough for the muses to dance freely with the angels who kept holy vigil over the Angles. But the England that arrived in America was no longer Mary’s Dowry; she was Perfida Albion (perfidious England), as Bishop Bossuet called her after lusty King Harry’s defection from the true Church.

England had no use for Catholic Spain, whose Armada would have invaded her isles in 1588, had it not been destroyed in a furious storm. Nor did she harbor a great love for her across-the-channel neighbor, Catholic France — whose inhabitants were commonly known in Angleterre as “our natural enemies.”

Illustrative of this inimical relationship would be James Moore’s 1702 and 1703 invasions of Florida, where English Protestants murdered priests and Indians alike, carrying off as many as ten to twelve thousand of the latter as slaves. (The brutal handling of the Red Man at the hands of the British would be inherited by the United States, which have committed innumerable atrocities against the natives of this land. One need not be a modern liberal to acknowledge this: the missionaries did so in their day.) The English were no less problematic for the French than they were for the Spanish. The French and Indian War (the North American theater of Europe’s Seven Years’ War) was very much a Catholic versus Protestant thing. Indeed, Anglo-America (first under the British, then under the U.S.) would gradually destroy l’Amérique française. (The history of French America is fascinating and too little known to United Statesians. Read Gary Potter’s excellent “Québec and French America: What Might Have Been” for an introduction to this study.)

Mention of the anti-Catholic wrongs of Anglo-American history is not an exercise in demonizing an entire nation. After all, we should have Catholic hearts to love the English and pray for their return to Roman unity — as the Church has officially long done. The point here is to show how our land, whose soil was once purpled with the blood of Catholic martyrs, was hijacked by the votaries of heresy. God’s providence allowed it, but that does not mean it was a good development.

Perhaps worse than the outright persecution by English Protestants was the character of Catholicism as it came to the colonies and passed into the states. I characterized it previously as “a weak, timid, all-too-impressed-with-their-fellow-countrymen-who-were-heretics type of religion.” A sample of this can be seen in the directives given by Lord Caecilius Calvert to the governor and commissioners of the Maryland colony. Calvert was the second Lord Baltimore, a Catholic, who, in 1633, warned the officials of the new colony to “be very careful to preserve unity and peace amongst all the passengers on Shipp-board, and… suffer no scandal or offense to be given to any of the Protestants, whereby any just complaint may heerafter be made by them, in Virginea or in England, and… for that end… cause all Acts of the Romane Catholique Religion to be done as privately as may be, and… instruct all Romane Catholoques to be silent upon all occasions of discourse concerning matters of Religion; and… treat the Protestants with as much mildness and favor as Justice will permit.” (James Hennesey, S.J., American Catholics, A History of the Catholic Community in the United States, p. 39; orthography as in original.)

Practicing one’s Faith “as privately as may be” and being “silent on all occasions of discourse concerning matters of Religion” is commonly known as the sin of human respect. This religiosity was not a quirk of Lord Baltimore (Calvert’s title); it put its stamp on the new venture. And for little good did the colonists hide their light under a bushel basket. Eventually, the anti-Catholic penal laws were in full force in Maryland, thanks to their more outgoing countrymen, the Calvinist Puritans, who came there from New England. Not only that, some generations later, the Calverts lost the Faith and became Episcopalian. Spiritual combats are not won by a policy of perpetual retreat. By 1790, another prominent Maryland family would give us our Republic’s first bishop, Bishop John Carroll, whom I have described elsewhere in less than flattering terms. Just over a century later, that same attenuated and timid Catholicism would develop, with an infusion of Enlightenment thinking, into the heresy of Americanism.

True, I am leaving out many details, and, also true, there were good moments in Maryland Catholicism, including evangelistic efforts directed to the Indians. But overall, the Anglo-American Catholicism that supplanted the French and Spanish cultural embodiments of the Faith was of an inferior class. It is only just to admit this. That it has woven itself into our religious and cultural fiber is something we must acknowledge in order to know ourselves and overcome our deficiencies. I say “ourselves,” even though I have not a drop of English blood in me. It matters little, for — although the immigrating Catholics of the nineteenth century did often give us something more vibrant — in inheriting a language and a national identity, we have inherited, to some degree at least, the temperament of its Catholicism.

Let us work and pray for the day when merry England and the United States will be worthy of a title like “Mary’s Dowry”!

  • Fred Barcode

    Hey, look, Brother: There’s a great article on the dedication of the U.S.A. to Our Lady’s Immaculate Conception.

    http://www.ewtn.com/library/HOMELIBR/LANDMARY.HTM

    Just thought you’d like to know. Great article, by the way.

  • James Foley

    Brother Andre,

    Who is lusty King Harry? Your readers cannot be expected to know everything you know.

    James

  • Sorry, James. I was referring to Henry VIII, whose libido led him to call himself the head of the Church in England. See http://www.thinkbabynames.com/meaning/1/Harry, where Harry is explained to be a nickname for Henry.

  • Christopher

    I really do feel sorry for the author and readers of this article as it is clearly not only misleding, but also wrong.

    If you want to read about King Henry VIII – then see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_VIII_of_England
    for a more balanced view.

    Clearly the English Reformation was one of THE most important events in history, acknowledged by most churches across the world – excetpt the Catholic church.

    In terms of America, The Evangelist movement grew out of this space and tolerance of the newer forms of Christianity.

    The ritues and dogma that the Catholic church invented were never quoted by jesus, and if you take a good hard look at the current Catholic thinking it is about 200 years out of date.

    How can you tell the African continent, rife with suffering due to Aids, not to use Condoms? Why are females treated as un-equals? Why are sexual relationships deemed ‘immoral’ – etc etc etc.

    The Kindom of Heaven is WITHIN, not in ROME or even within the Chruch of England — dont belive me?

    “knock and the door will be opened” (eg mediate and you will see for youself).

  • Christopher
  • Christopher: I stand by my brief comments on Henry VIII. He was what I said. I would not dispute you when you say that the English Reformation was one of the most important events in history. No doubt. I agree. So was the French Revolution; so was the Bolshevik Revolution. Importance does not imply glorious, beneficial, or even good. But they were all important in history.

    Your progressivist defense of the Anglican Schism is no argument in its favor, but, rather, a refutation. Christianity is by its very nature “traditional,” inasmuch as it preserves the deposit of faith entrusted by Jesus to his disciples. The moral abominations of contraception (unleashed in Christendom by the Lambeth Conference ca. 1930) are a case in point. Catholicism has consistently preserved Christian tradition on this point in the face of the vicissitudes of temporal affairs.

    Tradition is never out of date.

  • jdumon

    If the french king Louis the XIVth had complied to consecrate France’s kingdom to the Sacred Heart of Jesus, certainly the french Revolution would have been avoided and the whole America converted to catholicism.