Cardinal William Levada, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, gave a hastily called press conference early today to make the announcement. You can read Catholic News Agency’s account of that conference here.
This is news that has been in the making for several years. Smaller groups of Anglicans have entered the Church over the past few years, either as individuals, families, or even parishes. But this is a huge wave of converts that the Holy Father is dealing with here. They are members of the Traditional Anglican Communion and number over 400,000 souls with sixteen member “churches,” and somewhere between thirty and sixty bishops. The largest representation of the TAC is in Africa’s Zimbabwe and Tanzania, while about five thousand are in the United States. The Traditional Communion is headquartered in Australia under the leadership of Archbishop John Hepworth. The motivating factor that initiated the movement towards union with Rome was the Anglican community’s official approval of abortion, contraception, active homosexual clergy, same sex “marriages,” and women “ordinations.”
Archbishop Rowan Williams, leading prelate of the Anglican Community, is not pleased. Damian Thompson, writer for Telegraph.co.uk, reads Williams reaction as “humiliated – and, I suspect, furious that the Vatican sprang the plans to welcome ex-Anglicans on him ‘at a very late stage.’” Losing the half million shouldn’t bother the archbishop anyway — they were just an annoyance — but what apparently miffs him is that he wasn’t notified beforehand about the Vatican’s unusually hurried decision to announce this coming Constitution now.
Of course, dissatisfaction with a heretical “church” is not sufficient doctrinal matter for reception into the one, true Church of Christ; however, it certainly can be an actual grace moving one toward divine and Catholic Faith. Our God is a God who does bring good out of evil. In order to be received into the Catholic Church these disaffected Anglicans must accept all the teaching of the Roman Catechism, including the supreme authority and infallibility of the pope.
To be sure, the Holy Father must have given this Constitution much fatherly consideration. It is the product of long deliberation. In his heart, no doubt, Pope Benedict immediately rejoiced upon receiving two years ago the formal request of the TAC, but the logistics, so to speak, of accommodating so many converts as ecclesial communities of their own, required canonical and pastoral preparation. Add to this a vocal opposition among some of his own hierarchs, such as Cardinal Kasper, the head of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, who objected that such an en masse conversion would ruin ecumenical relations with the larger Anglican community.
The TAC had a specific request, contingent upon the pope’s approval, that they be allowed to keep their ecclesial structure and whatever in their liturgy was consonant with Catholic sacramental doctrine. This means that they wish to maintain certain elements of the Anglican liturgy that are based on the 1662 Book of Common Prayer as derived from the Catholic Sarum Rite. A number of the married ministers of the TAC also requested permission to be ordained priests and serve the flock that they had served before in the married state. Rome had already granted permission for this Anglican Usage arrangement in the past. I know of two such churches in Texas, one in San Antonio where Father Christopher George Phillips heads the parish of Our Lady of the Atonement, and the other in Arlington, where, in 1991, all the parishioners joined their minister in becoming Roman Catholic. St. Mary the Virgin Anglican Church became St. Mary the Virgin Catholic Church. The pastor, William Saunders, was ordained three years later and now serves his original flock as a priest. These special permissions for priests’ dispensations from celibacy in the Latin Church had only been granted where a congregation came into the Church as a body. An Anglican convert who is not a minister cannot get married, and then ask for holy orders. Nor can any married man who is a member of such a parish ask to be ordained in the Latin Rite. I assume that when the pastor in such a parish dies only a celibate priest can succeed him.
More recently, however, in the U.S., there have been some married Protestant ministers who have converted and, in view of the special pastoral provision granted Anglican ministers, they’ve asked if they could be ordained as well. The problem here, however, was that they did not bring a congregation in with them, and, obviously, they had no liturgy. Even still, Rome made an allowance for them. One of the more traditional-minded priests in our country, who has written many books on winning converts, is Father Dwight Longenecker, an ex-Bob Jones University Fundamentalist minister. The father of four doesn’t serve as a parish priest, but as a college chaplain.
It is important to remember that this issue of clerical celibacy is one of discipline not doctrine and, therefore, the special permission granted to married ministers who become Catholic priests of the Latin Rite could be rescinded in the future. After all, it is a concession that could easily be abused and could easily prove divisive. Why, for example, should a converted heretic, who, as a married minister, preached false doctrine, be allowed into the priesthood, and a married Catholic deacon is not? More important still, will this concession weaken the attraction that total, Christ-like sacrifice of body and soul presents as such a chivalrous challenge to a young aspirant with holy desires? When the Apostolic Constitution is made public perhaps these questions will find their answer therein.
The Vatican website has posted this notice from the Office of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith concerning the “personal ordinariates” for Anglicans who are entering the Catholic Church.
Tags: Archbishop John Hepworth, Archbishop Rowan Williams, Traditional Anglican Communion
That is a bold move but beware of the Catholic Church. I used to be Catholic but then I stopped practicing after I found out some disturbing truth. Some say the papacy is the antichrist. They changed the ten commandments which is the Law of God, the Pope claims to be a god, they have killed innocent people for centuries like the Spanish Inquisition and supporting the Nazis, and the priests have molested a lot of children. Jesus would not approve of any of these, it is not Christian, that is evil hiding behind religion. I pray people really to open their eyes. I know I did!!!
Dear Amy,
I’ll address but one of your many points. It is this: “They changed the ten commandments which is the Law of God.”
No, Amy, we didn’t. They are the same in our Bible as in most Bibles, with allowance made for different wording in the translations. Do you mean the numbering? There are actually 14 “commandments” — as in commands or proscriptions (dos or “don’ts”) — in the Decalogue. How they are gathered together depends on whether you are a Jew, a Latin Catholic, and Eastern Christian, or a Protestant. (Like the chapters and verses in your Bible, the ten commandments did not come from God with numbers.)
Okay, I’ll address another point. “Some say the papacy is the antichrist.” Well, concerning Jesus, “Some [said He was] John the Baptist, and other some Elias, and others Jeremias, or one of the prophets” (Mt. 16:14). Again, some said He was a Samaritan and had a devil. Others called him a deceiver, etc., etc.
Can you show us that “the papacy” — a two-millennial institution, not a person — is “the antichrist,” using scripture alone? If not, then what “some say” is of little consequence.
I am pleased that more are entering the Ark of Peter which of course is the most important thing for the saving of their souls. My problem is the Liturgy (which is called the Anglican Use) It apparently is a “Catholicized” version of Cranmer’s whatever. Is this true? Why not have them come back in the way they left using the old Roman Rite (OK in English if they prefer) I have heard so many conflicting stories about what the Anglican service is , Is it Novus Ordo , what i said above or is it already the Old Roman Rite in English. I can see problems already forming onthe liturgy alone.
……….Oh by the way lets drop the word Anglican completely.